
Credit: Citizen of Europe made by AI for editorial purposes
America Inc. By PeanutsChoice | CitizenOfEurope.com | 18 June 2025
Estimated reading time: 6 minutes
What happens when a president sees himself not as a public servant — but as a CEO?
This isn’t the first time an American leader has pushed the limits of executive power. Nixon claimed that “if the president does it, it’s not illegal.” Reagan centralized messaging through media control. But what Trump has initiated is far more radical — not a drift, but a deliberate pivot to corporate logic.
Since his return to the White House in 2025, Donald Trump has aggressively implemented Project 2025, the 900+ page blueprint from The Heritage Foundation — backed by over 100 right-wing organizations — that aims to centralize executive power, dismantle independent agencies, and reengineer governance in his favor.
This isn’t just authoritarian drift — it’s the beginning of a new political model. One that mirrors the radical theory of neocameralism, where the state is no longer democratic, but corporate.
What Is Neocameralism?
Neocameralism, coined by software engineer and political theorist Curtis Yarvin, treats the state like a private company:
- Citizens are customers, not voters.
- The state is owned, not governed.
- The leader is a CEO, not a president.
- There are no elections — just shareholders, who choose or remove the CEO.
- Rights aren’t guaranteed — they’re terms of service.
The idea sounds extreme. But many elements are now echoed, consciously or not, in Project 2025 — which borrows heavily from the structure of private corporations: hierarchical control, brand loyalty, and centralized ownership — and in Trump’s second term.
Yarvin’s term draws on Cameralism, a 17th-century Prussian system where bureaucracies served absolute monarchs, not citizens.
Trump Isn’t Quoting Yarvin — But He’s Following the Script
Trump doesn’t cite neocameralism, but his actions track its logic almost perfectly:
| Trump’s 2025 Actions | Neocameralist Equivalent |
|---|---|
| Reviving Schedule F to fire federal workers | CEO eliminates disloyal staff |
| Controlling DOJ, EPA, FCC, Smithsonian | CEO subordinates all departments |
| Targeting journalists and dissent | Brand management: suppress bad PR |
| Delegitimizing elections | Customers don’t vote — they comply |
| Weakening courts and Congress | Shareholder rule replaces checks |
Trump is not leading a republic. He is managing an asset — consolidating authority and removing anything he does not control.
Can a CEO President Be Fired?
Under the U.S. Constitution, a president can be removed by:
- Elections
- Impeachment
- The 25th Amendment
But if Trump completes Project 2025, those mechanisms — while still on paper — become hollowed out.
🔻 What Exists Today (2025)
| Mechanism | Status |
|---|---|
| Impeachment | Technically possible, politically implausible. Trump survived two. GOP loyalty holds. |
| Judicial Oversight | Undermined by Trump-appointed courts. DOJ increasingly answers to the White House. |
| Elections | Undermined by gerrymandering, voter suppression, and election disinfo. |
| Protest & Press | Still legal, but delegitimized and sometimes targeted. |
🔺 What Changes Under Project 2025
| System Pillar | Change |
|---|---|
| Impeachment process | Internal loyalty makes bipartisan impeachment virtually impossible. |
| Department independence | DOJ, FBI, FCC become tools of the presidency. |
| Electoral mechanisms | Federal election monitors eliminated; civil rights enforcement gutted. |
| Checks & balances | Executive branch consolidates total operational control. |
| Public accountability | Citizens lose any practical means to check power. |
Who Can Remove Trump in This System?
Not voters. Not Congress. Not courts.
Only those aligned with Trump — donors, insiders, ideological elites — would hold any sway. This includes networks like The Heritage Foundation, America First Legal, and the Federalist Society, who act as power brokers rather than representatives of public will.
That’s the neocameralist logic: the public is no longer sovereign. Power is owned, not earned. The presidency becomes a private office, insulated from democratic input.
Why This Matters — Right Now
This is not a forecast. It’s already happening:
- Schedule F has returned, reclassifying federal workers for at-will termination.
- Civil service purges are underway, starting with regulatory and legal agencies.
- Independent departments are being reorganized under the president’s authority.
- Disinformation and legal warfare against critics are escalating.
Trump’s administration, powered by Project 2025, is quietly replacing democracy with a model where power is centralized, unaccountable, and elite-directed.
This isn’t fascism in uniform. It’s executive neocameralism in business casual — a system already prototyped in places like Hungary and El Salvador, where leaders use legalistic mechanisms to entrench authority while maintaining a veneer of order.
Democracy isn’t dying in one stroke — it’s being refactored.
In tech speak, ‘refactoring’ means altering code without changing its behavior — here, it means changing the rules of governance while keeping the outward appearance of legitimacy.
Public accountability is not being abolished, but delegitimized, outsourced, and slowly replaced with executive governance styled after the corporate world.
If we allow this shift to normalize, we are surrendering the ability to correct it.
Democracy Is Not Optional
Democracy is slow, flawed, and often frustrating — but it is the only system where power can be peacefully removed.
If we abandon that principle — if we normalize rule by loyalty and ownership — we will find ourselves governed not by law, but by force disguised as efficiency.
You don’t vote out a CEO. You unsubscribe — if you still can.
🔍 Sources
- Project 2025 – Heritage Foundation
- “Trump Revives Schedule F to Reshape Civil Service” – NYT
- “The Plan to Fire 50,000 Government Workers” – ProPublica
- “Disinformation and Electoral Manipulation in 2024–25” – Reuters
- “How Trump Is Reconstructing Executive Power” – Brookings
- “Voting Rights Under Threat” – Brennan Center
- “Trump’s War on Federal Agencies” – The Guardian
⚠️ Disclaimer
This article is for informational and editorial purposes only. It reflects Citizen of Europe’s commitment to fact-based journalism, democratic values, and institutional accountability. We do not endorse political violence or authoritarian governance.
You may like: Project 2025 and Neocameralism: Inside the Blueprint for Authoritarianism






