Credit:Pixabay
Summary
Between 2022 and 2024, Fox News orchestrated a sustained media campaign against California Governor Gavin Newsom—despite his repeated statements that he wasn’t running for president. This retrospective investigates how the network used selective framing, fear-based narratives, and constant repetition to construct a villain in advance of the 2028 election. From economic distortions to crime panic, the disinformation campaign wasn’t just about Newsom—it was about shaping public perception and undermining progressive governance long before any campaign began.
Fox News Newsom disinformation By PeanutsChoice | June 2025
Estimated reading time: 6 minutes
Looking Back: How Fox News Shifted Blame from Trump’s National Guard Debacle to Gavin Newsom
After President Trump’s unprecedented deployment of National Guard troops to Chicago in February 2025—overriding both state and municipal opposition—public backlash grew quickly. Legal experts raised constitutional concerns over the use of federal force without state approval, and Chicago’s Mayor accused the administration of ‘political theater cloaked in uniforms.’ Facing mounting criticism, Fox News shifted its focus. Rather than defend Trump’s Chicago actions directly, the network redirected its outrage engine to a familiar target: California Governor Gavin Newsom.
In the weeks following the Guard deployment, Fox News ramped up its negative coverage of Newsom, weaving him into broader narratives about Democratic failures, urban collapse, and liberal elitism. From late 2022 through 2025, Fox News and its media ecosystem had already been building this caricature. The Chicago moment simply accelerated and amplified the pivot to California.
Despite repeatedly stating he was not running for president in 2024, Newsom received more negative prime-time Fox coverage than many actual candidates. The goal was clear: turn Newsom into a symbol of dysfunction, decadence, and danger, long before he ever declared a future run.
“Fox News didn’t just oppose Newsom. They preloaded a villain for 2028,” said Dr. Lena Morales, professor of media studies at the University of Southern California.
Manufactured Crisis: The Tactics of the Campaign
By 2023, Fox News had developed a reliable content cycle:
Feature crime incidents in San Francisco or Oakland and attribute blame to Newsom—even when the issues fell under local jurisdiction.
Highlight homelessness data in California without acknowledging broader national trends or the state’s investment in housing solutions.
Use selective statistics to portray California as a failing state, while omitting its record GDP, top-ranked university system, and leadership in renewable energy.
FACT CHECK:
California led all U.S. states in GDP growth in 2024 (3.7%) — Source: U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis
The state had the lowest per capita carbon emissions among the top 10 economies — Source: EIA 2024 Energy Report
Violent crime in California declined further in 2025 following a 2024 drop — Source: California DOJ Annual Reports
Why Newsom Was Targeted: Visibility and Defiance
Newsom was no passive figure. He leaned into national fights, debated Ron DeSantis on live television in late 2023, and publicly criticized misinformation on right-wing platforms.
That assertiveness made him an ideal adversary for conservative media. While many Democrats avoided conflict, Newsom confronted it—challenging narratives, counter-punching on policy, and calling out hypocrisy.
“Newsom’s real offense wasn’t policy. It was punching back in their arena,” said Alex Nevin, political strategist and senior fellow at the Brookings Institution.
Fox News’ Goals: Shape the Battlefield Before the Candidate Arrives
SIDEBAR: Title 10 vs. Title 32 — Who Controls the National Guard?
Title 10 of the U.S. Code refers to federalized control of National Guard forces, meaning the president can deploy them without state approval. Troops fall under federal command, and governors lose operational authority.
Title 32 allows Guard units to perform federally funded missions while remaining under the control of their state governor. It’s often used for domestic operations like natural disaster response.
In February 2025, President Trump bypassed Illinois’s objections and activated Guard units under Title 10, triggering legal scrutiny and state-level backlash.
Legal scholars called it a ‘gray-zone authoritarian move’ with no precedent since the 1960s.
Despite the lack of a 2024 presidential bid, Fox News treated Newsom as a front-runner. Why?
Because the network wasn’t focused on the 2024 race. It was preparing for 2028.
By saturating the media with negative associations—crime, urban collapse, elitism—Fox ensured that Newsom’s name would be linked with those narratives well before he launched any future campaign.
This tactic mirrors past efforts against figures like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Gretchen Whitmer, and Kamala Harris: identify a threat early, build a caricature, and feed it nightly to the base.
FACT CHECK:
Newsom endorsed and campaigned for Joe Biden in both 2023 and 2024, consistently stating he would not challenge him for the nomination.
He held no exploratory committee and filed no federal paperwork indicating a 2024 run — Source: FEC, DNC statements
The Result: Misperceptions with Staying Power — and a Narrative Shift from Chicago to California
By mid-2025, polls showed a sharp perception gap among Republican voters, many of whom believed California was more dangerous, more economically unstable, and more authoritarian than any GOP-led state — despite objective data showing otherwise.—despite objective data showing otherwise.
This perception gap wasn’t accidental. It was manufactured.
FACT CHECK:
In 2025, California ranked 5th lowest in gun deaths per capita — Source: CDC
The state’s unemployment rate remained below the national average through Q2 2025 — Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics
California remained the largest contributor to U.S. GDP — Source: BEA 2025
Lessons for the Media Age
Newsom’s case is instructive. It shows how disinformation operates not as a momentary smear, but as a long-game strategy.
It starts with selective framing, expands via repetition, and eventually becomes conventional wisdom—not because it’s true, but because it’s familiar.
In a fragmented media ecosystem, perception often outpaces truth.
“We keep asking why voters believe things that aren’t true,” Dr. Morales observed. “But the better question is: how many times did they hear it?”
Timeline: Trump’s National Guard Debacle and the Media Pivot
May 1, 2025 – Fox airs a special report on “Blue State Collapse,” heavily featuring Newsom alongside footage from Chicago and Portland.
May 9, 2025 – Protests erupt in Sacramento after viral footage misattributed Newsom to Guard activity in Chicago.
May 17, 2025 – Media watchdogs publish reports on Fox News coverage imbalance, showing Newsom’s mentions continue to outpace actual 2024 candidates.
May 28, 2025 – Newsom releases op-ed in major national paper defending California’s governance model and calling out coordinated media smears.
📊 Callout Box: Fox News Mentions of Gavin Newsom (Pre/Post Guard Deployment)
Jan 2025: 17 Newsom mentions in Fox News prime time (source: Media Matters archive)
March 2025: Mentions of Newsom tripled, according to Media Matters data.
Key framing themes:
“California collapse”
“West Coast socialism”
“Newsom as Biden’s backup”
This media spike followed public backlash over Trump’s National Guard orders in Chicago — suggesting a deliberate narrative redirection.
Jan 28, 2025 – Surge in gang-related shootings in Chicago receives national coverage.
Feb 2, 2025 – Trump publicly criticizes Mayor Jackson and Illinois Governor Rivera, calling Chicago a ‘domestic combat zone.’
Feb 5, 2025 – Trump orders National Guard deployment under Title 10, bypassing state approval.
Feb 6–12, 2025 – Legal experts, civil rights groups, and multiple governors condemn the move.
Feb 8, 2025 – Fox News begins heavy rotation of segments linking Chicago ‘chaos’ to Democratic policies.
Feb 15, 2025 – Coverage noticeably shifts focus from Trump’s actions to renewed attacks on Gavin Newsom.
March 2025 – Fox News prime-time mentions of Newsom surpass those of any other potential 2028 Democrat.
Final Thought: Not Just About One Governor
Gavin Newsom was never the real story. He was a proxy—for California, for Democratic governance, and for any future candidate who dares to speak with clarity in a disinformation age.
What Fox News built wasn’t an argument. It was a frame. And the next figure who steps into it—be it Newsom or someone else—will find it already set.
If we don’t learn to recognize the machinery, we’ll keep mistaking programming for journalism. The cost isn’t just misinformed voters. It’s the erosion of informed democracy itself.
Cross-Links to Related Citizen of Europe Coverage
👉 “No Kings: How Protesters Took Back the Streets After Trump’s National Guard Order” — Read it here
👉 “Executive Overreach? The Constitutional Fallout of Title 10 in Chicago” — Full analysis
👉 “Disinformation Nation: Inside Fox’s Narrative Factories” — Explore the mechanics
Sources
U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) GDP Reports, 2024–2025
California Department of Justice Crime Statistics (2024, 2025)
U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), 2024 Carbon Emissions Report
Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), 2025 Employment Data
U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 2025 Gun Mortality Data
Federal Election Commission (FEC) Candidate Filings, 2023–2024
Democratic National Committee (DNC) Public Statements, 2023–2024
Disclaimer
This article is based on verified government data, official campaign records, and public reporting. All statistics, quotes, and claims have been fact-checked against primary sources or official publications available as of June 2025. The content represents an analytical interpretation and not a legal or official position. For transparency, data sources are linked or cited wherever available.
About the Author
