Credit : Adobe Stock
Project 2025 By PeanutsChoice | CitizenOfEurope.com
June 8, 2025
It Didn’t Stay in America
For years, Europeans treated Trumpism as an American oddity—loud, chaotic, and self-contained. A political storm that would pass. It hasn’t. It’s evolved, professionalized, and started crossing borders.
And its latest export isn’t a slogan. It’s a system.
The Blueprint: Project 2025
What began as a collection of policy memos has become a playbook for transforming U.S. governance. Project 2025, spearheaded by the Heritage Foundation and backed by over 100 right-wing organizations, outlines how a future president could consolidate executive power, purge civil servants, and dismantle regulatory and judicial independence.
It proposes:
- Mass firings of public officials who resist presidential directives
- Subordination of the Department of Justice to White House control
- Rollbacks of environmental, educational, and civil rights protections
- Erosion of international alliances seen as limiting U.S. “sovereignty”
This isn’t reform—it’s a manual for one-party rule cloaked in democratic language.
The Ideology: Neocameralism, Repackaged
Behind this institutional restructuring lies a more radical idea: neocameralism, developed by tech theorist Curtis Yarvin. It envisions governments operating like corporations, where citizens are no longer voters but passive shareholders. No elections. No public accountability. Just managerial authority.
The appeal? Efficiency, order, and control.
The danger? It guts democratic norms from the inside out.
Once dismissed as fringe, Yarvin’s ideas now resonate in Silicon Valley boardrooms and among far-right political influencers. Project 2025 reads like their implementation strategy.
Why Europe Should Be Paying Attention
The transatlantic right isn’t just borrowing American talking points—it’s importing an entire strategy.
Across Europe, we’re watching:
- Orbán’s Hungary tighten media control and centralize power
- Meloni’s Italy push nationalist cultural policy and restrict opposition
- Le Pen, Wilders, and AfD echo U.S. anti-immigrant and anti-climate rhetoric
- Far-right parties adopt funding models and messaging from U.S.-based networks
But the concern runs deeper. In Brussels, civil society groups are warning that EU-wide digital sovereignty measures could be undermined by U.S. lobbying aligned with Project 2025 goals. Poland, Slovakia, and Spain have all experienced surges in anti-EU sentiment fueled by coordinated social media campaigns that mirror tactics from American operatives.
Think tanks in Germany and the Netherlands have noted a sharp uptick in transatlantic funding and consultancy ties, especially among parties that seek to erode EU unity from within. Europe’s fragmented media and rising nationalist sentiment make it vulnerable to this ideological importation.
The mechanics are becoming familiar: culture war as distraction, “sovereignty” as a euphemism for deregulation, and public disillusionment as a gateway to authoritarian consolidation.
Recent EU parliamentary shifts have intensified these risks. The 2024 elections saw a surge in far-right representation, particularly in France, Germany, and the Netherlands. Although the centrist coalition maintained a slim majority, nationalist and Eurosceptic parties gained unprecedented influence over parliamentary committees related to digital policy, migration, and foreign affairs. Their growing presence reflects not just electoral gains, but an ideological shift that mirrors the logic of Project 2025—centralized authority, anti-regulatory rhetoric, and disdain for pluralism.
This Isn’t a Culture War. It’s Political Infrastructure.
What’s spreading isn’t just outrage—it’s architecture.
From political appointments to media ecosystems and think tanks, the far right is building transnational systems that replicate each other. Europe is not a passive observer in this process—it’s becoming a staging ground.
The danger isn’t that Europe will imitate America’s chaos. It’s that it will adopt its control mechanisms without the spectacle—quietly, efficiently, and legally.
What We Risk Losing
This is not a debate about political style. It’s about substance:
- Independent courts
- Free and critical media
- Scientific and cultural institutions
- Minority rights
- Electoral integrity
When these are rebranded as obstacles to “efficiency,” democracy itself becomes a negotiable asset.
Sources
- Project 2025 – Heritage Foundation (April 2023): The full “Mandate for Leadership,” a 922-page conservative agenda
- Curtis Yarvin – Unqualified Reservations: Blog archive (2007–2014), origin of neocameralism
- New York Times – Far-Right International Networks (2024–2025): Reports on U.S.-Europe far-right ties
- Washington Post – Trump Allies and the Administrative State (Nov 6, 2024): Overview of Project 2025 planning
Disclaimer
Citizen of Europe is committed to independent, fact-based journalism. This article reflects publicly available sources as of June 8, 2025. Any use of AI tools was limited to editing and formatting under full human oversight.
You may like: Inside Trumpworld: The Fortress Built to Kill Democracy
About the Author
