Illustration created for Citizen of Europe. Editorial use only.
When Western leaders warn of the “China threat,” it sounds simple: an authoritarian state on the march, a danger to democracy and peace. But the label hides more than it reveals. China is dangerous — yes — but so is the story the West tells about it.
Beijing’s Authoritarian Playbook
Inside China, repression is not an accident; it’s policy. From the mass detention of Uyghurs in Xinjiang, to Hong Kong’s dismantled freedoms, to the ever-tightening web of surveillance cameras, the message is clear: dissent is weakness, control is strength.
Beijing exports that model abroad. Surveillance tech from companies like Hikvision and Dahua props up governments from Africa to Latin America. The idea of “digital sovereignty” — the state’s right to censor, monitor, and filter the internet — is now a Chinese export as much as cheap steel once was.
In its neighborhood, China throws weight around. The South China Sea, claimed through its “nine-dash line,” has become a fortress of artificial islands and missile bases, despite a 2016 international tribunal ruling rejecting Beijing’s claim. Taiwan, meanwhile, lives under constant PLA drills, while Xi Jinping makes clear reunification is not optional.
The West’s Convenient Mirror
And yet, the West’s warnings about danger sound uncomfortably familiar. The United States still spends more on its military than the next ten countries combined. It has toppled governments in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, and beyond. Europe lectures about human rights while selling spyware to autocrats and cutting deals with Gulf monarchies.
Washington’s obsession with China often says as much about its own decline as about Beijing’s rise. A rival that refuses to accept second place must be cast as a menace. “Dangerous” becomes the label that justifies military budgets, trade barriers, and alliances that are as much about containing China as about defending democracy.
The Economic Trap
Everyone condemns Beijing’s weaponization of trade — punishing Lithuania for hosting a Taiwan office, blocking Australian exports after a political spat. But the West plays the same game: tariffs, sanctions, tech bans. Both accuse the other of economic coercion. Both are right.
And both sides are addicted to the relationship they claim to fear. Europe depends on Chinese rare earths for its green transition. U.S. companies still manufacture in Shenzhen. Chinese consumers keep Western brands afloat. Beijing needs those markets just as much as they need its factories. The “dangerous dependency” is mutual.
Why It Matters
“Dangerous” is not wrong — China is dangerous to Taiwan, to free expression, to smaller states forced to bend. But the West is dangerous too, when it projects democracy selectively and fuels confrontation for its own strategic ends.
The real danger lies in the spiral: Beijing tightening control, Washington doubling down on rivalry, and Europe caught in the middle, choosing between subservience and autonomy.
The China threat is not just about China. It’s about whether two powers can avoid burning the world while staring into each other’s mirror.
Sources
- United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (2022), report on human rights in Xinjiang.
- Permanent Court of Arbitration (2016), ruling on the South China Sea arbitration between the Philippines and China.
- SIPRI Military Expenditure Database (2024), global defense spending comparisons.
- European Commission (2021–2023), trade disputes and cases involving China and Lithuania.
- Reuters, AP, Politico — coverage of Taiwan military drills, Australia-China trade disputes, and Huawei/TikTok concerns.
- Chatham House & CSIS — analysis on China’s Belt and Road and digital authoritarianism exports.
No ads. No masters. Just truth — powered by you.
You may like:
About the Author
